Every month I pay two hundred quid for my energy when it could be free.
For that energy I pay for children to be bombed. For that energy I pay for the climate to be polluted. For that energy I pay for Mother Earth to have her face gouged out until she bleeds black sulphur and nothing will grow.
They’ve known that since the fifties.
In November 1954, a Caltech researcher submitted a formal proposal to the oil-industry-funded Air Pollution Foundation warning that CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels could be “of considerable significance to civilization.” The proposal was approved, funded, and shared with Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and BP’s predecessor companies. Exxon’s own scientists accurately projected today’s temperature rise from internal modelling that began in 1977. They prepared their own infrastructure for sea-level rise while funding decades of denial and blocking a transition they had the money and the engineering to make possible.
For what?
Look at these men I am having to instruct to read tort law in my Discord. Because they got mass laid off. Over this AI bullshit.
And a billionaire who stays rich under socialism — but has to share some of his made-up-money with everybody else — fights that tooth and nail... To a psychotic level.. Acting like the death cult that they are.
Sam Altman had Molotov cocktails slung at his house. And yet he got up on stage a couple of days later and started talking about how companies needed to protect themselves from over-litigation when it comes to AI. Not: how do we stop the harm. How do we close the gap where ordinary people could, in theory, make a claim after you HARM THEM.[^7][^8]
This is the lineage of Jonestown. Of the genociding of indigenous people. Of Sandy Hook parents fighting tooth and nail against rifle lobbies. People who just don’t want their four-year-old children shot in the face.
The system is set up so that the rational move is to extract.
Blaming the system is an unthinkable abuse in itself, because they set the system up like that.
Oil companies chose denial and disinformation over transition because they correctly calculated that lying would be more profitable than telling the truth and shrinking their core business. Cloud and AI firms are building the same architecture now: offloading workers, lobbying to cap their liability, building chokepoints in compute and cloud and IP that they can rent back to everyone else, forever.
The person who controls the computers other people depend on has the cleanest form of power available in a digitised economy. Recurring revenue. Structural leverage. A slow, quiet enclosure and then erasure of everyone exit. The railways ran the same play. When the bubble burst, losses were socialised while control remained private.
We have been here before.
I did not particularly want to manifest onto this existence in this realm. I certainly didn’t want to wake up this morning and think about this death cult AGAIN on this nice sunny day.
I just wanted to survive. As everybody else does.
I live in a generation of people who finally, actually, don’t structurally all have to work. Because there is enough for everyone. Instead of dividing the essential jobs between all 9 billion, we are all working for the five people who refuse to share. And they would rather go to war with their small penises over which one of them gets to put the choke point on the world’s next natural, unlimited supply.
And then they wonder why women are telling them to their face: you are repugnant. I would stab myself in the eyeballs before I would look at you, because you work for Palantir, and that is enough to give me the ICK!!!
Use my fire as your fuel.
The coders getting laid off have half the skills needed to fight this. The other half is learnable. The overlap is where accountability becomes possible. I’m reading tort law with anyone who wants to join, in my Discord.
TOPICS
Statute book
GDPR enforcement
Case law on negligence and strict liability.
Traditional tort law depends on a clear chain: harm occurs, you identify the wrongdoer, you recover damages. AI breaks that chain in three places. The system that denied your benefits or set your bail has no assets, no legal personality, no capacity to be sued. The institution deploying it claims the decision was algorithmic, not human. And the opacity of the model makes proving negligence or discrimination nearly impossible.
To fight them, you must first understand it — and this level of tech and law specialism, where expertise overlaps, is rare.
So we build the stack. Train the coders. Learn to keep the compute local. If enough people build independent infrastructure now, cloud monopoly remains a supervillians evil strategy, not an irreversible reality. If we don’t act, it will harden into the only option.
The technology moves faster than regulation, faster than professional training, faster than courts can develop precedent. Fighting these systems requires not just understanding them but being able to prove, in admissible evidence, how they failed — and who had the power to prevent that failure.
That is a rare combination of skills.
And institutions deploying AI know it.
So if you’re reading this and you understand me — or if you’re someone who can read an Oxford paper on tort doctrine — you have an obligation to get up and be proactive in the fight against Big Tech.
The type of person who dismantles a toaster for fun is going to be so valuable in the future.
Refuse the death cult.
Sources
DeSmog: Revealed: Big Oil Told 70 Years Ago That Fossil Fuel Emissions Could Impact Civilization (November 2024) — documents proving oil executives were formally warned about CO2 and climate change in 1954–55.[^6]
Scientific American: Exxon Knew About Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago (October 2015) — Exxon’s internal 1977 climate modelling.[^1]
ExxonMobil Climate Change Denial, Wikipedia — documented history of denial campaigns.[^2]
Greenpeace: Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline (2024).[^3]
Island Institute: The Smoking Gun: What the Fossil Fuel Industry Knew (2021).[^4]
Georgetown Common Home: Defense, Denial, and Disinformation: Uncovering the Oil Industry’s Early Knowledge (2023).[^12]
Science: Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections (January 2023) — peer-reviewed confirmation of Exxon’s predictive accuracy.[^5]
Open Markets Institute: Cloud Computing Is Too Important to Be Left to the Big Three (May 2025).[^9]
Tech Policy Press: Big Cloud Is Building Power via Pervasive Investments (August 2025).[^10]
NBC News: Man Accused of Throwing Molotov Cocktail at Sam Altman’s Home (April 2026).[^8]
Yahoo News / AI Backlash: When AI Backlash Turns Revolutionary (April 2026) — Altman’s post-incident litigation comments.[^7]
Oxford Law Blogs: Addressing AI-Related Harms Through Existing Tort Doctrines (July 2024).[^27]
SSRN: Liability in the Era of Algorithms (2026).[^19]
Union Communiste: Britain — A Decade of Privatised Railways — privatisation, socialised losses, private control.[^15]
Wikipedia: Impact of the Privatisation of British Rail.[^17]
Local AI Master: AI Hardware Guide 2026.[^24]
Sitepoint: Run Local LLMs 2026: Complete Developer Guide.[^25]
References
Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago - Exxon was aware of climate change, as early as 1977, 11 years before it became a public issue, accor...
ExxonMobil climate change denial - From the 1980s to the mid 2000s, the American multinational oil and gas corporation ExxonMobil was a...
Exxon’s Climate Denial History: A Timeline - The article describes how management at Exxon learned about the potential risk of climate change as ...
The smoking gun: what the fossil fuel industry knew (and ... - Shell oil began raising its offshore oil rigs, for example. “By the late 1980s, the oil industry had...
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections - Science - We find that 63 to 83% of the climate projections reported by ExxonMobil scientists were accurate in...
Revealed: Big Oil Told 70 Years Ago That Fossil Fuel ... - New documents show how a deceptive PR strategy pioneered in 1950s California first exposed the risk ...
When AI Backlash Turns Revolutionary: Molotov Cocktails ... - AI-related layoffs hit 55,000 workers in 2025 while tech leaders promise utopian futures. The violen...
Man accused of throwing Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s ... - A person authorities identified as Daniel Moreno-Gama throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Ope...
Cloud computing is too important to be left to the Big Three - Max von Thun argues that cloud computing has become essential public infrastructure, and calls for r...
‘Big Cloud’ is Building Power via Pervasive Investments - Cloud computing giants use these investments to exert influence over the entire tech industry, and e...
What Big Oil knew about climate change, in its own words - The industry’s own words, as my research found, show companies knew about the risk long before most ...
Defense, Denial, and Disinformation: Uncovering the Oil ... - As early as 1959, oil industry executives understood the connection between burning fossil fuels and...
The Rule of Three in Cloud Computing: Why Markets Always ... - The size of leading cloud providers creates advantages through purchasing economies. They negotiate ...
natural monopoly and railway policy in the nineteenth - Fear of monopoly did lead to the creation of a supervisory body, the Railway Department of the Board...
Britain - A decade of privatised railways - Mar/Apr 2006
Since the Tories finally managed to push through their privatisation of British Rail, ...
The Railways, the Market and the Government - This monograph traces the history of railway policy back to its earliest ... and legally granted nat...
Impact of the privatisation of British Rail - The privatisation of British Rail began in the 1990s. Rail passengers in Great Britain from 1829 to ...
AI Governance: Essential Insights for Organisations: Part II - Effective AI Governance must be comprehensive and proactive, integrating elements from global regula...
ai-governance and algorithmic accountability: rethinking legal ... - As a result, existing legal standards often lag behind the pace of AI technological development, cre...
Broken Ladder: Are Lawyers Sleepwalking into a ... - Regulators and insurers are increasingly demanding human-in-the-loop safeguards for AI output. But t...
New study warns of talent crisis - A recent study reveals that AI’s impact on legal training may create a significant skills deficit am...
From innovation to exposure: artificial intelligence risks for ... - As generative AI tools increasingly are part of legal practice, attorneys should be mindful of poten...
AILX - Artificial Intelligence Law eXperts’ Post - The technology is moving at 10x speed. Professional rules are moving at 1x. That gap is where your f...
AI Hardware Guide 2026: GPU, CPU & RAM for Local AI - . Budget: $600-$1,200 (Entry-Level) ;. Budget: $1,500-$2,500 (Mid-Range) ;. Budget: $3,000-$5,000 (H...
Run Local LLMs 2026 | Complete Developer Guide - This guide walks through the hardware requirements, tooling decisions, installation, Python integrat...
Algorithms on Trial: Closing the Accountability Gap - Algorithms are no longer hidden tools in back-end systems; they now decide who gets hired, who secur...
The law and economics of AI liability - This paper identifies the challenges of AI for liability and assesses how liability rules should be ...
These big tech companies would not be able to exist without interest and limited liability based capital. Limited liability and interest were both considered sins in Christianity once upon a time. Before the joint stock company was innovated, Europeans traded via commends, a copy of mudharaba used by Muslims. Furthermore, climate change is also driven by interest and LL. The mass private ownership of carbon spewing metal boxes is virtually completely a function of interest bearing loans (hardly anyone buys their cars cash). Long distance shipping and aviation, key carbon producers, would be impossible without limited liability. Furthermore, fake fiat money created by interest bearing loans, renders globalised trade and travel possible. If money were still tied to gold, Europeans and North Americans would be traveling regionally (by rail probably), buying regionally manufactured goods (no mass offshorong of jobs) and eating regional foods - the climate suffers because it is considered normal for Germans to eat grapes in February and Canadians to eat mangoes, at all! Rail really is the epitome of transport. All the best with your lawfare against these demons that walk among us <3
having glossed over the general gist of this article,i get the impression that you accept the BS on global warming,regardless of the proofs to the contrary by a multitude of professional climatologists,prof.tim ball,prof.richard lindzen,dr.patrick moore,and 37,000 scientists denied access to the airways,any warming,if it occurs,precedes a rise in Co2,not visa versa, Co2 is 0.04% of atmospheric gases can you not see the nonsense.